The Vedic Religion in Ancient Iran and Zarathushtra

BY: SUBHASH KAK

Jan 21, CANADA (SUN) — A two-part comparison of Zoroastrianism and Vedic culture.

Scholars generally agree that before the advent of Zarathushtra, the religion of the devas was current in Iran. For want of a better term, some have called the pre-Zoroastrian religion Persian paganism. [1] But here we argue that to do so is to obscure its connections with the Vedic religion. The similarities between the pre-Zoroastrian Persian religion and the Vedic religion are too many to give it any other name.

The term Zoroastrian is after the Greek version of the name of the prophet Zarathushtra (zarat, like Sanskrit harit, golden; ustra, Sanskrit or Old Persian for camel), who has been variously estimated to have lived either around the time 1200 BC or perhaps half a millennium later. A Greek tradition assigns him to an age 258 years prior to Alexander, that is the 6th century BC. [2] The name by which the Zoroastrians call their own religion is Mazdayasna, the religion of Ahura Mazda (Sanskrit Asura Medha, "Lord of Wisdom").

The Rgveda 8610 has the expression medham rtasya, "wisdom of truth". Zarathushtra presented his religion as rival to the religion of the daevas, that is Daevayasna Zarathushtra came from Bactria in northeast Iran, near Afghanistan The Avesta speaks of several lands that include the Sapta-Sindhu (Sindhu-Sarasvati region of North and Northwest India). The scripture of the Zoroastrians is the Avesta. It includes the Yasna (Sanskrit Yajna) with the Gathas of Zarathushtra, Videvdat or Vendidad (Vi-daeva-dat, "anti-Daeva"), and Yast (hymn), which are hymns for worship. During the Sasanian period the Avesta was translated into Pahlavi and this version is called Zend Avesta.

The Zoroastrians speak of mathra (Sanskrit mantra) as utterances that accompany meditation. Like the Vedic tripartite division of society, the Zoroastrians have the classes priests (zaotar), warriors (nar), and pasturers (vastar).

It has been assumed for some time that the daevas of the Mazda faith are the same as the Vedic devas and therefore Zarathushtra inverted the deva-asura dichotomy of the Vedic period. In reality, the situation is more complex and the Vedic and the Zarathushtrian systems are much less different than is generally supposed.

From Kashmir, which belongs square within the Vedic world, comes crucial evidence regarding a three-way division consisting of devas, asuras, and daevas. The scheme rejects the three-way division that is basic to Vedic thought. These three divisions in the outer realm are the earth, atmosphere, and the sun; in the inner world they are the body, breath (prana), and consciousness or atman. This tripartite classification is mirrored in the gunas of Indian thought: sattva, rajas, and tamas.

Deva, or devata (heavens, sattva): power related to understanding
Asura (atmosphere, rajas): power related to activity
Daeva (earth, body, tamas): power related to acquisitiveness

Kashmiri folklore has many tales where daevas are counterpoints to devas and asuras. Sometimes the term raksasa is used as a synonym for daeva. This term raksasa occurs very frequently in Sanskrit literature. The word raksas appears in the Rgveda, the Aitareya Brahman and other texts; it is also considered equivalent to Nirrti. The raksasa form of marriage is the violent seizure or rape of a girl after the defeat or destruction of her relatives. It is entirely possible that the term daeva came into Kashmir late as a result of the immigration of Persians. If that were the case, the reason why it took root is because it served as a synonym for an existing idea. It is equally possible that the term has been current in Kashmir from ancient times and its usage there parallels that by Zarathushtra from the nearby Bactria. Further support for this view comes from the fact that the Kashmiri Hindus, who have remained isolated from any Persian immigrations of the last few centuries, follow many practices that are prescribed for Zoroastrians. These include the sacred thread for women (called aetapan in Kashmiri) and the sacred shirt (sadr).

The Vedic view of seeing the world in triple categories was in the later Puranic gloss simplified into dichotomies like that of deva versus asura (including raksasa). Zarathusthra made a similar simplification using the dichotomy of asura (including deva under the label yazata) and daeva. The asuras are the ground on which the devas emerge. The Zarathushtrian reduction is not particularly different from the Puranic.

In this paper, I summarize the general structural and nomenclatural similarities between the Zoroastrian and the Vedic systems. I hope to show that the Zoroastrian innovations on the prior Vedic system in Iran have parallels in the adaptations that were taking place in India in the Puranic period. But Zarathushtra's emphasis on a sharp dichotomy between good and evil gave rise to an aesthetic and an approach that was quite unique.

The General System:

Here is a list of divinities that are included by the Zoroastrians amongst the forces of the good where I provide the corresponding Sanskrit spelling within brackets:

The Great Lord:

The supreme God of the Zoroastrian faith is Ahura Mazda (Asura Medha). He is self-created, omniscient, omnipresent, holy, invisible, and beyond human conceptualization. In Yast, Ahura Mazda proclaims: "My sixth name is understanding; my seventh is Intelligent One; my eighth name is Knowledge; my ninth is Endowed with Knowledge; my twentieth is Mazda (Wisdom). I am the Wise One; my name is the Wisest of the Wise."

This is reminiscent of Purusha in the Vedas. The Cosmic Purusha projects on the three planes of the heavens, the sun, and the earth into the Visve Devah, Indra, and Agni. Likewise, Ahura Mazda projects his power of good through the Amesha Spenta (Immortal Energy).

Vohu Manah (Su Manah): Good Intention; Persian Bahman
Asha Vahishta (R ta Vasistha): Best Law; Ardvahisht
Kshathra Vairya (Ksatra Vairya): Heroic Dominion
Spenta Armaiti (Spanda Aramati): Bounteous Devotion
Haurvatat (Sarvatata): Wholeness
Amaratat (Amaratata): Immortality

The first three are conceived of as masculine beings, the last three as feminine. The division of the six Amesha Spentas in three classes, with masculine and feminine forms, appears to parallel the projection of the power of Purusha into divinities in the three planes of Mind, Law, and Kingship.

Common deities (Yazatas):

Many deities are identical in the Zoroastrian and the Vedic systems. Some can be recognized by noting the peculiar sound transformation in going from Sanskrit to Avestan, such as asa obtained from rta.

The Vedic deities are conceived within the framework of the bandhu between the astronomical, the terrestrial, and the physiological and the spiritual. [3] There seems to be a similar conception behind the Adorable Gods (Yajatas), since they include several stars such as the Pleiades, Sirius, and Vega.

Airyaman (Aryaman): An Aditya who appears together with Mitra. In Yast 3, there is invocation to Airyama isyo, the "Desirable Airyaman". Aryaman represents hospitality

Apas (Apah): Cosmic Waters; Aban

Apam Napat: Child of the Waters The pre-Zoroastrian Varun a is still invoked in the yasna service as Apam Napat

Aradvi Sura Anahita (Sarasvati Sura): also Harahvati and the goddess Anahita

Arstat (Rta): Justice, Order

Asi, Maza-ray (Maha-ray): Fortune, "treasure-laden" (Yast 17)

Asman (Asman): Stony vault, Sky; seen in opposition to Zam, Earth

Atar (Atharvan): Agni

Atharvan (Atharvan)

Cista (Sista): Goddess of the Way, Mithra's companion (16th Yast)

Daena: Religion, in later Persian Den, "Woman who can possess you" The word daena survives in Kashmiri and Punjabi

Dadar (Data): Giver

Gav (Gauh): Cosmic Cow, Earth

Hvar (Svar): Sun; in later Persian the prefix Khor as in Khordad (given by Sun)

Iza (Ida/Ila): Goddess of Sacrifice

Mithra (Mitra), also Mihr. Seen in Raman Khrastra, "Rama's Ks atra", Ramarajya, in the Ram Yast. Good Vay (Vayu) is called Ram (signifying joy and peace)

Sraosa (Brhas-pati): Companion of Mithra. In later Persia, as Saros or Siroos, he is the angel who mediates between God and man

Thworesta (Tvastr): Fashioner

Ushah (Usa): The Goddess Dawn that makes self-illumination possible

Vad (Vata): Wind

Vayu, Vay (Vayu): Breath

Verethraghan (Vrtrahan): Indra as destroyer of the veil of ignorance (Vrtra) as in the Vedas = Persian Bahram

Vivanhvant (Vivasvant): Sun

Yima (Yama); as in Jam or Jamshed (Yima Khsaeta, "Yima Radiant") deserted by Khvarnah (Suvarn ah ), Sun

Mitra and Bhaga are two of the Adityas, names of the Sun, in the Vedas. The other Adityas from a late list are Indra, Aryaman, Vivasvant, Visnu, Parjanya, Varuna, Dhatr, Pusan, Am su, and Tvasta.

Since Mitra and Varuna are dvandva partners in the Vedas, the omission of Varun a from the Zoroastrian lists indicates that Zarathushtra was from the borderlands of the Vedic world, where the Vedic system was not fully in place. This would also explain the omission of divinities such as Visnu and Rudra. [4] Likewise, it explains why the names of the Pleiades (Krttika in Sanskrit) are very different: Paoiryaen. But since Varuna is mentioned in the Mitanni documents, it is clear that the pre-Zoroastrian religion in Iran included Varuna.

It is remarkable that Baga (Skt Bhaga), the pre-Zoroastrian name of God in Iran, is not listed amongst the Yazatas This omission may be a consequence of the adoption of a new divinity, Ahura Mazda, in place of the old one

Common cultural concepts:

The Zoroastrian innovations did not change the basic Vedic character of the culture in Iran. The worship ritual remained unchanged, as was the case with basic conceptions related to divinity and the place of man. In disease, the Zoroastrians speak of Aesma in place of Yaksma.

Amesa (Amrta): Immortal. The emphasis is on a state beyond time from which the phenomenal world emerges

Arta (Rta): Asha; Cosmic Order

Azi (Ahi): Dragon This is the dragon that covers truth

Baresman (Barhi): grass strewn on vedi

Druj (Druh): opposite of Asha, falsehood, anrta

Framayisn (Yajamana)

Frashasti (Prasasti)

Hamkar (Samskara)

Haoma (Soma); Used in ritual

Humayi (Su+maya): good maya

Karapan (Krpan): Niggardliness, Zarathusthra is hostile to it

Kav, Kay, Kavi (Kavi): Inspired seer

Mahal (Mahalaya)

Nahn (Snana): ritual bath

Pavi (Pavitra): place to sacrifice

Saena (Syena): the eagle; also Saena meregh (mrga), Simurgh

Sogand (Saugandha): oath

Urvar (urvar): the original plant or productive ground; later Persian ruvan, soul

Vah, Vah (Svaha, Svaha): Invocation at the fire ritual

Varah (Vrata): Vow

Yasna (Yajna); also Jashn; the act of worship; sacrifice

Yatu (yatu): magic; jadu

Yima son of Vivanhvant (Yama son of Vivasvant)

Yazata (yajata); worthy of worship

Zaotar (hota): priest

Zaothra (Stotra): Worship

The struggle between the Arya and the Dasyu in the Vedas is paralleled by one between the Arya and the Turya (Turks).

Five divinities in Yasna Haptanhaiti

Asi (As): Reward, called Maza-rayi (Maharay)

Is (Isa): Enjoyment

Azuiti (Ahuti): Plenty

Frasasti (Prasasti): Satisfaction

Parandhi (Purandhi): Nourishment

Zarathushtra nowhere names the daevas born of Angra Mainyu (Pahlavi Ahriman, Hostile Spirit), but Middle Iranian books label Indar (Indra), Nanhaithya (Nasatya), and Savol. These appear to be a personification of the acquisitive aspects of the devas. Confirmation of this idea comes from the fact that Vayu in the Zoroastrian view is said to have two aspects, one good and another harmful (zinake). The good Indra, as Verethraghan (Vrtrahan), the destroyer of the veil of ignorance, is a yazata.

FOOTNOTES:

[1] Boyce, 1975, 2001. In the Gathas, Zarathushtra uses the imagery of the cow repeatedly, without reference to the plough or tilling of the soil. This has been taken to imply a pastoral life-style. This inference by Boyce and other scholars before her is in error since the usual meaning of the term gauh in the Vedas and the Avesta is "Earth". In fact, farming was introduced in Central Asia as early as the 5th millennium BC and the idea of pastoralism in Zarathushtra's age on this argument is wrong.

[2] Ernst Herzfeld in his Zoroaster and His World has argued for the later date in contrast to the earlier date by Mary Boyce in her History of Zoroastrianism. In my judgment, Herzfeld's arguments are stronger.

[3] See Kak, 2000, for the astronomical bandhu that illuminate the origin of divinities.

[4] It should be noted that the names in themselves are not as significant as the structure of the system.

The Sun News Editorials Features Sun Blogs Classifieds Events Recipes PodCasts

About Submit an Article Contact Us Advertise HareKrsna.com

Copyright 2005, HareKrsna.com. All rights reserved.