In ISKCON there has been a deliberate ongoing mood to forget Srila Prabhupada's disciples, and the damage it has done to the movement is staggering. It's a trickle down affect: forget/ignore Prabhupada's disciples and pretty soon, you're forgetting Srila Prabhupada's instructions too.
The deliberately abysmal attempt the GBC body made to atone for their offense made to my godbrothers and godsisters who questioned the neglect of HDG Srila Prabhupada's exact instructions is legend. It has opened Pandora's Box in ISKCON, letting in so many deviant practices in worship, preaching and management , which Srila Prabhupada warned us against.
From Hindu programs and yoga retreats to Krishna West… all are
compromises that were not introduced or welcomed whatsoever by Srila Prabhupada when he was on the planet.
I present to the worldwide community of devotees (with a broken
heart) one, yes only one of many examples of how the GBC Body has insulted and banned my beloved godbrothers/sisters from ISKCON for pointing out the truth of their mistakes, then and now.
To this day, my respected Godbrother HG Pradyuma das has not made a return to ISKCON. Only in recent years has the GBC made any real effort to encourage him back into service, which I understand he has done to a limited degree. He is one of many. Most have never been invited back, and so have not come back at all, and it's terrible. Likewise, the GBC never made real Guru reform, to this very day -- the issue over which Pradyumna was drummed out of the movement.
An apology was not enough, as it was not followed up by Guru
reform in ISKCON, as it should have been, with Srila Prabhupada put back in the center of devotees' lives, attention and worship. As a result of the behavior of the GBC Body, many thousands of devotees don't come to ISKCON at all.
The karmic reactions for such heartless, ignorant, careless, proud behavior on the part of the GBC haunts that body, and all of ISKCON to this very day.
Please read the following VNN article and Letter to Satsvarupa Goswami to learn the truth of ISKCON GBC history in this regard. Try to understand the implications to ISKCON of today.
A cosmetic fix to the Zonal Acaraya/Guru issue was incomplete, and ISKCON is suffering the reactions to this very day.
Pradyumna Prabhu & GBC Apology
BY SATYAHIT DAS
EDITORIAL, Feb 19 (VNN) - The discussion of the original 11 zonal acharyas with Pradyumna prabhu is on 3 cassette tapes. Rocana prabhu gave them to us to transcribe which we did not do, so we returned them to him. I clearly heard Ramesvara prabhu say that Hridayananda prabhu, after reading Pradyumnas letter to Satsvarupa prabhu, (of 1978, directly after Srila Prabhupada's disappearance, when they were all set to install their vyasasanas in the ISKCON temples) remarked that Pradyumna prabhu is a "demon". This I heard quite clearly and so can you. Jayapataka prabhu, Jayatirtha prabhu were also there, among others.
The point of apology by the GBC to Pradyumna prabhu, that my friend Ananda prabhu has posted, quite entirely misses the mark, although the apology may be counted as nice by some. We say it misses the mark because in that letter by Pradyumna prabhu, whom Ananda prabhu rightly points out that he loves Srila Prabhupada most dearly and that he performed highly meritorious work assisting Srila Prabhupada's movement, and that he has been absent from ISKCON the last 20 years. Pradyumna prabhu was literally shocked and dismayed by the new intention to install 11 new vyasasana and acharyas in ISKCON. Hridayananda prabhu not only named Pradyumna prabhu a demon, but also took over his service of translating the Srimad Bhagavatam and then all 11 acharyas kicked Pradyumna prabhu out of the Hare Krsna movement for good it appears. An the apology though possibly well intentioned does not address what Pradyumna prabhu wrote in his letter to Satsvarupa prabhu. In other words, what is the point of glorifying this devotee Pradyumna prabhu, then apologizing for past abuse of his highly good self, all the while not changing one iota in ISKCON pertaining to what Pradyumna prabhu said.
Yasodananda prabhu was also heard to be present at this meeting. The two, Pradyumna prabhu, Yasodananda prabhu were simply over shadowed, over ruled , named as demons & kicked out of their spiritual masters movement some 20 years ago, to which they have not returned, nor do show any intention of doing unless Srila Prabhupada be placed back as the only initiating acharya of ISKCON. So you may say that these two devotees were the first to bring up the ritvik argument in protest & the very same argument has just placed seven more well liked leader type devotees on probation. NOTHING has changed, so where is the point to apologize to Pradyumna prabhu. May as well also apologize to Yasodananda prabhu, another highly scholarly devotee, dedicated to Krsna consciousness and Srila Prabhupada!
To utilize an analogy, this apology is like bombing a country while simultaneously apologizing for the devastation, while still continuing to destroy the country. What is the point of apologizing to Pradyumna prabhu, while simultaneously continuing the same program for which he protested & was kicked out of ISKCON. That's like saying we apologize to you Pradyumna prabhu, and your very nice, but we still do not agree with you and if you return, we have to put you on probation.
We do not intend to be vicious here at all, but the high degree of hypocrisy inherent in the apology is much too evident to ignore.
Our general conclusion being that we are all in illusion, and we have therefore descended to this material realm, where Srila Prabhupada came to save us requesting that we cooperate, but to the great misfortune of the world at large and the Hare Krsna movement, we are not doing so.
Quarrel and hypocrisy being the symptoms of this age, we disciples of His Divine Grace are doing a great job of quarreling with each other, while banning devotees of differing views from ISKCON.
There were 11 who first took the guru posts, half of whom left in one way or another, and now there are 100 gurus in ISKCON, but the majority of older god brothers & sisters are not returning to their spiritual masters movement to serve these 100 gurus and it does not appear that they are ready to change anything, although apologies may appear nice.
Satyahit das
Letter from Pradyumna das prabhu -to Satsvarupa Maharaj:
*Note All words that were underlined are in UPPER CASE letters for lack of other facility in my email program.
(Re-typed for clarity)
Sri Sri Guru Gauranga Vayatah
7 August, l978
Dear Satsvarupa Maharaj,
Please accept my most humble obeisances. Maharaj, I am writing you this letter with GREAT anxiety in my heart and after days and days and long nights of thought and careful consideration.
I have been staying in Vrndavan for some time and have not visited any other center recently except Delhi. Therefore, my information I have about what is happening at our other centers comes only from devotees visiting here, occasional letters, newsletters and our society's magazine and other publications. But the news I hear from these sources is very alarming and therefore I am writing you in some anxiety.
The matter concerns the Godbrother who were selected by Srila Prabhupada to accept disciples. At the time of Srila Prabhupada's disappearance, it was most clearly understood by all of us present that Srila Prabhupada MADE NO SUCCESSOR. Everyone admitted that fact and understood it clearly. Instead, the GBC was to jointly manage ALL affairs of ISKCON just had been the case previously. This was the same solution as desired by Om Visnupada Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati Thakura, who also had not made any successor, although his wishes were NOT followed. In addition to the GBC management, Srila Prabhupada also selected 11 somewhat advanced disciples to grand initiation to newcomers. However if was never mentioned at any time by His Divine Grace that these 11 were to be known as ACARYAS. He simply instructed that they may now accept disciples. Otherwise, as it was understood and practiced at that time, there was NO SPECIAL POSITION given to these 11, either in the society as a whole or in relation to their Godbrothers. Management would depend on the joint GBC, and among Godbrothers and sisters all are on the same level, with the exception of some special regard and respect shown to older (senior) disciples by these Godbrothers and Godsisters who are junior.
Now at present, I understand that the 11 GURUS are all 1)adopting the title of ACARYA, 2)sitting on high Vyasasanas in front of Srila Prabhupada's Vyasasana and their own Godbrothers, 3)accepting worship and great respect normally reserved for a GURU from the rest of their Godbrothers and 4)that the previous GBC zones have all been given by mutual agreement or by invitation among the different acaryas.
First of all, the word ACARYA may be taken in 3 senses. Etymologically the word means "one who practices" or "one who practices what he preaches." This is the general meaning and may be used in relation to any pure devotee period. Secondly. The word means "one who grants initiation to a disciples." This is specifically indicating one who is a GURU. Anyone who grants initiation or is a guru may be called as "acaryadeva, " etc.-by his disciples only! Whoever has accepted him as guru must give all respects to him in every way, but this does not apply to those who are not his disciples.
Thirdly, the word acarya indicates "the spiritual head of an institution or pitha." This meaning is very specific. It does not mean just anyone. It means only one who has been specifically declared by the previous acarya to be his successor above all others to the seat of the spiritual institution which he heads. He alone, among all of his Godbrothers, is given a raised set and special honor. No other Godbrother may receive such respect and he is the authority in all spiritual and material matters. This is the strict tradition in all of the Gaudiya Sampradayas. Now Srila Prabhupada, it is clear, did not appoint any such successor because no one of his disciples at present is advanced to the level of Krishna Consciousness necessary to assume such a position. Nor did Srila Prabhupada make 11 such ACARYAS. This was never mentioned by Him. They were only given permission to make disciples and the GBC was to jointly mange, materially and SPIRITUALLY.
There was never any distinctions made by Srila Prabhupada between material management and spiritual management. Both are the concern of the GBC. The 11 gurus may be known as acaryas only in the second sense of the word-to their disciples as mantra-giving gurus, not in the third sense, as "the" spiritual successors of Srila Prabhupada. That was never meant to be by His Divine Grace.
Secondly, among Godbrothers it is not correct that any one of them sit above the others, especially in the presence of Gurudeva. If Gurudeva is not present, sometimes the sannyasi Godbrothers may be given an asana, but that asana does not mean a huge gigantic seat. It simply means a square piece of cloth or wool not more than 1/8" or 1/4" thick.
This is asana. If any one Godbrother or many Godbrothers sit above the others it is not at all proper.
Sometimes in an assembly there may be raised platform or table on which the sannyasi speakers sit, but ALL SANNYASI Godbrothers must be invited to sit in an equal place on the speaker's platform. Sometimes a grhastha or brahmacari Godbrothers may also be invited to sit there if they are deserving by their advancement. If there is an appointed acarya as mentioned before (third sense of the word) then he alone may sit higher than the other Godbrothers. Indeed in the different Gaudiya Mathas, even if one Godbrother is in the position of acarya, he usually, out of humility, takes only a thin cloth asana, not anything higher. It is the symptom of a Vaisnava to be extremely humble. He MUST always be extremely careful of putting himself in a position where he may become conceited. A guru may take a higher seat than his disciple--that is bonafide. But he cannot illegally take a higher seat than his Godbrothers. The relation between the guru and his Godbrothers and a guru and his disciples is entirely different. He should not sit higher than Godbrothers other than if he is a sannyasi, on a thin cloth as already mentioned if offered by his Godbrothers, or accept respect from them without offering respect in return. This is the general niti or etiquette. Besides this, there are, among Godbrothers, some further rules to be observed between those who are senior and those who are junior. Seniority is calculated according to the time of receiving 1st (Harinam) initiation or by his ability to perform bhajana.
If one Godbrother has disciples, the guru-puja and Vyasa-puja of that Godbrother should be conducted in a separate place or his private room--not in from of all his other Godbrothers. In an assembly of Vaisnavas, all sit on the same level together, Godbrothers along with their sisyas. No one is permitted to accept separate respect from disciples in any gathering of other Godbrothers. In Gaudiya Math, the Vyasa-puja of one Godbrother who has disciples is usually performed in the following manner. The guru takes his raised seat in his private place and invites all his Godbrothers to come to the function also. If his Godbrothers come to offer him some flowers, that Godbrother guru immediately first worships his other Godbrothers and offers them garland, candana, etc., and in some cases presents like cloth, umbrella, etc. They honor each other and are seated properly, then that guru's disciples may come forward and offer their worship. This is the system being observed. Incidentally, the words of Om Visnupada Srila Bhakktisiddhanta Sarasvati Thakura found in the English book Sri Caitanya's Teachings regarding the sitting above everyone else are from a speech delivered in response to the offerings of his disciples on the occasion of his Vyasa-puja. Those words are in relation to his disciples--not to his Godbrothers, of which there weren't any. The niti in regard to Godbrothers is completely different from that to disciples.
One who is actually guru may make disciples anywhere he finds someone who is worthy. The connection between guru and disciple is arranged by Krsna directly--and it is not subject to legislation. All the world-wide temples of ISKCON are controlled by the GBC. The temples are managed by them jointly and they decide each year which member of the GBC will manage in which place. The GBC who is appointed to be responsible for a certain zone somewhere on this planet, if a guru, will naturally make many disciples in that place--but how can he be illicitly restricted from accepting a disciple from someplace else. That is material consideration. It has another to do with transcendental order, by which guru and disciple make their meeting. It is not geographical.
Secondly, no GBC who is guru may make that zone of which he is temporarily in charge by appointment of the joint GBC, into his own private place. If some other guru visits there and some newcomer wishes to accept him as spiritual preceptor, how can he be prohibited? Furthermore, all the temples of ISKCON are to be run by the GBC. No one GBC who is a guru may use the title acarya of such and such a zone. Srila Prabhupada never appointed one acarya of the whole ISKCON nor did he appoint several acaryas for parts of ISKCON. This will only lead to an ultimate division of the one ISKCON into many different fragments and destroy our united preaching work.
If someone sets up his personal seat as acarya in different temples, how can it be removed? Who else can sit in it? Then does that temple belong to that guru or does it belong to the GBC? That means the power or control is switched from joint GBC to the 11 gurus. Srila Prabhupada never intended this arrangement. Moreover, in the future, in accordance with His Divine Grace's instructions, other qualified Godbrothers may also become gurus. Where will they go? In Srila Prabhupada's temples no raised seat should be given to any but Srila Prabhupada--all Godbrothers should sit on the same level. One exception may be made in the case of one speaking from the sastras like Srimad Bhagavatam, Bhagavad-gita, Caitanya-caritamrta, etc. during the class. But that seat is very special. It is not for the reader--it is meant for the book. After paying obeisances to that seat, he who is to read, may, after taking permission from his senior Godbrothers and sannyasis, ascend to read from Bhagavatam. After finishing, he may again pay his obeisances.
Much of the knowledge written here is not found in sastra, but is called sistacara--that which has been taught by the conduct of the past guru parampara. It has not been specifically mentioned in any sastra, but still it is accepted as authoritative because of being seen to be the conduct of previous acaryas and their disciples.
Maharaja, after very much consideration and consultation and also confirmation by older members of our sampradaya, I am writing to you to see if you can rectify the present situation. Many of us here, older Godbrothers, are very concerned in two ways-- 1) that the 11 gurus not having been appointed to the position of acarya and for which they are unqualified both by a.the insufficient knowledge of sastra and b. the incomplete realization of Krsna consciousness, are accepting worship on that level--and this may lead to anomalies in the society and personally, because of lack of complete detachment in atmajnana, to a buildup of pride and subsequent falldown, and 2) that the united society ISKCON, because of illegal division and control by a few members instead of the joint GBC will become broken up in separate societies and the unified preaching effort very much hindered.
Hoping for your immediate attention and kind reply,
Pradyumna das Adhikari
P.S. These are not good signs for our society. Older Godbrothers and sannyasis here are very concerned that if the present trend is not checked immediately, it will have passed beyond that point and ISKCON will be in chaos in the near future. I hereby formally request that all these points be immediately brought to the attention of the GBC so that a very tactful solution for all concerned may be decided and amicably implemented in our society. Please note that there is nothing personal in this letter. It is some pertinent spiritual knowledge meant for the good of all. If anyone takes offense, I very humbly beg pardon at his feet.
I would like to request your kind acknowledgement of the receipt of this letter and information on what action you intend to take as soon as possible, preferably before this coming Janmastami (Aug. 26).
Hoping that this meets you in the best of health,
In the service of Srila Prabhupada,
Pradyumna das Adhikari
